I've burned up over one hundred hours of vacation over the course of the last six months. Good thing I start earning four weeks per annum as of next week, I haven't had less than two weeks vacation sitting there doing nothing in several years now. I'm down to thirty one hours of vacation and twenty four hours of sick leave. Woe is me; whatever shall I do?
robeli and I took a BMW convertable out for a test drive the weekend before last. After taking a test drive, she says she's a majority of the way to being convinced. Excellent.
And yes dear, of course I know you're reading this.
All I can say is holy shit. It drove wonderfully; stuck to the road like it was superglued down, has a nice responsive 235bhp 3.0L inline 6 for an engine, and a 6 speed manual tranny mated up to 18"F/18.5"R low profile tires with big GIANT ventilated rotors on all four (ABS of course) that stop like it was free and corner like being on rails. I'm in lust.
Oh yeah, and the roof disappears at the touch of a button. We had to test drive the M3, as they didn't have any 330ci models with the Performance option and the manual tranny (the engine in the M3 has slightly more power than the straight 330(c)i w/Perf. pkg (and the dual exhaust on the M3 is a little more throaty sounding, but I prefer quieter anyway...the 330i is 225, w/perf is 235, I think the M3 might be 240 or 245 (I was wrong, it's 333bhp), but it's not much different), but not enough that it'll make any real world difference). Anyone who'd buy that car with an automatic transmission deserves to be taken out back and shot.
All the other shit that BMW throws on a car is just icing. There are better performing cars out there, but not with 4 seats and a roof that retracts.
If money didn't matter and I didn't need room for a carseat, I'd hunt down a 1989 930 (911s haven't been 911s internally since the 70s, it's a marketing number these days) Turbo Carrera conv. and ask that nice Mr. Ruf to work his magic. I'd kill for a 911 chassis that did 206mph. and still managed to be street legal, and that's what Ruf does to Porsches.
I love this disc, but I'd make one change to make it really ideal; I'd drop "Sorry Seems to be the Hardest Word" and put "Mona Lisas And Mad Hatters" on it instead.
And yes dear, of course I know you're reading this.
All I can say is holy shit. It drove wonderfully; stuck to the road like it was superglued down, has a nice responsive 235bhp 3.0L inline 6 for an engine, and a 6 speed manual tranny mated up to 18"F/18.5"R low profile tires with big GIANT ventilated rotors on all four (ABS of course) that stop like it was free and corner like being on rails. I'm in lust.
Oh yeah, and the roof disappears at the touch of a button. We had to test drive the M3, as they didn't have any 330ci models with the Performance option and the manual tranny (the engine in the M3 has slightly more power than the straight 330(c)i w/Perf. pkg (and the dual exhaust on the M3 is a little more throaty sounding, but I prefer quieter anyway...the 330i is 225, w/perf is 235, I think the M3 might be 240 or 245 (I was wrong, it's 333bhp), but it's not much different), but not enough that it'll make any real world difference). Anyone who'd buy that car with an automatic transmission deserves to be taken out back and shot.
All the other shit that BMW throws on a car is just icing. There are better performing cars out there, but not with 4 seats and a roof that retracts.
If money didn't matter and I didn't need room for a carseat, I'd hunt down a 1989 930 (911s haven't been 911s internally since the 70s, it's a marketing number these days) Turbo Carrera conv. and ask that nice Mr. Ruf to work his magic. I'd kill for a 911 chassis that did 206mph. and still managed to be street legal, and that's what Ruf does to Porsches.
I love this disc, but I'd make one change to make it really ideal; I'd drop "Sorry Seems to be the Hardest Word" and put "Mona Lisas And Mad Hatters" on it instead.
From:
no subject
Also, pfft to the manual fetishism. Modern automatics are great, and if you're not blowing out your clutch on purpose, the performance difference is negligible. The only reason to get an automatic is if you like the psychology of doing something with your right hand while driving.
From:
no subject
Strike that, reverse it.
Personally, I prefer to drive a manual. I feel more in control, and mroe connected to the driving, and I get better gas mileage, too.
From:
Shifty types.
When I drive for fun, I want a stick. I want to be able to park the tranny in 3rd and wind it up around the curves and let the engine limit the speed on the downside of the hills. It's about control, and you don't get that with an automatic; it shifts when it wants to. It lets gravity accelerate you when you're doing just fine, thanks. It makes you wait when you floor it halfway through a curve while it decides to shift, and then takes its time to get around to doing it.
Screw that.
The final drive in the 6spd is also nice and high so it gets better mileage out of the 3.3L on the highway than the 2.5L in the 325 (which doesn't even have the 6spd. tranny as an option).
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
If I lived in a time when I could actually drive on the roads, I'd drive a manual transmission in a heartbeat. I don't know about you, but I crawl through stop-and-go traffic 5 days a week. Dealing with a clutch for all that bullshit when you don't have to -- why?
I'm sure I'll get lambasted for this as well, but I like using my free hand for a cell phone when I need it.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
"The average U.S. motorist spends 46 hours each year or nearly two full days stuck in rush-hour traffic jams."
http://news1.iwon.com/odd/article/id/425790|oddlyenough|09-07-2004::14:29|reuters.html
Fucking time murderers. I want those two days back!
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
"hello tranny? please shift now?"
"hey driver, get bent, my book says third gear now, no way I'm going to second."
"please? see I'm going a little slower"
"well, wait a second, hmm, ok."
From:
no subject
[1] There was the doubleparter in which they tried to prove that Toyota pickup trucks were indestructible, as evidenced by the fact of them turning up in every bit of footage from wartorn third world countries. The things was driven down stairways, ran down a wall or two, left on the beach as the tide came in (it was eventually found by a fisherman a ways over), incinerated, and left on the top of a 28 story flat as it was being explosively demolished. The chassis broke in half, such that the thing was held together by bodypanels and the driveshaft.. but the engine still went.
This is one of their less crazy stunts.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Sounds like the wave of the future to me.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
It doesn't have "Mona Lisas and Mad Hatters"? Well, that's a damn shame. I'd rank that one in the top five of EJ.
From:
no subject
CD One:
01: Your Song
02: Levon
03: Tiny Dancer
04: Rocket Man (I think It's Going to be a Long, Long Time)
05: Honky Cat
06: Crocodile Rock
07: Daniel
08: Saturday Night's Alright For Fighting
09: Goodbye Yellow Brick Road
10: Candle in the Wind
11: Bennie and the Jets
12: Don't Let the Sun Go Down On Me
13: The Bitch is Back
14: Philadelphia Freedom
15: Someone Saved My Life Tonight
16: Island Girl
17: Sorry Seems to be the Hardest Word
From:
auto vs manual
and the M3 produces roughy 100 bhp per liter, the best ratio around right now, if I remember
/drives 350Z Touring - 287 hp at 6200 rpm
From:
Re: auto vs manual
Yeah, my del sol would be pathetic with an automatic shifting out just before the power band hits.
From:
Re: auto vs manual
From:
Re: auto vs manual
Yeah, I end up breaking traction in the honda on paint more often than I like.
From:
Re: auto vs manual
From:
Re: auto vs manual