jsbowden: (Default)
( Jun. 12th, 2008 08:55 am)
After I upgraded my machine at home at the end of last summer, I went ahead and gave MS a bit of my money and bought a copy of Vista Ultimate. Yeah, I know, but it's my money. I got the retail version because it comes with both 32 and 64 bit media, and I wanted to play around with it.

After having Vista on my laptop for six months, I knew the ins and outs, what services to kill, and what interface tweaks to make for my own personal comfort. The one thing the laptop doesn't have is 64bit. OEM versions only come with one or the other, and Dell ships 32bit by default (and makes it difficult to get 64bit at that).

Having run the 64bit version on my desktop? I'm ready to dump the 32bit completely. The only hardware problem is that I have one piece of hardware for which there is no 64bit driver (which is really weird, since the 32bit driver for it is supplied by MS). It's an older video capture board that I don't really use anymore since my camcorder does FireWire, so it's not a loss I'm terribly concerned with. The 64bit version is faster, stable, uses all 4GB of the installed memory, and runs most of my software. The bits stopping me from dumping the 32bit partition are Studio and Nero. I'm running older versions of both, which support Vista 32bit. In order to get 64bit support, I need to upgrade, which I don't really want to do right now.

I also want to move my office out of the basement to the empty bedroom upstairs, but don't really want to run cat5 and coax all over the house to do it. If the Cabling Fairy wants to do it for me, that'd be awesome.
jsbowden: (Default)
( Jun. 12th, 2008 08:55 am)
After I upgraded my machine at home at the end of last summer, I went ahead and gave MS a bit of my money and bought a copy of Vista Ultimate. Yeah, I know, but it's my money. I got the retail version because it comes with both 32 and 64 bit media, and I wanted to play around with it.

After having Vista on my laptop for six months, I knew the ins and outs, what services to kill, and what interface tweaks to make for my own personal comfort. The one thing the laptop doesn't have is 64bit. OEM versions only come with one or the other, and Dell ships 32bit by default (and makes it difficult to get 64bit at that).

Having run the 64bit version on my desktop? I'm ready to dump the 32bit completely. The only hardware problem is that I have one piece of hardware for which there is no 64bit driver (which is really weird, since the 32bit driver for it is supplied by MS). It's an older video capture board that I don't really use anymore since my camcorder does FireWire, so it's not a loss I'm terribly concerned with. The 64bit version is faster, stable, uses all 4GB of the installed memory, and runs most of my software. The bits stopping me from dumping the 32bit partition are Studio and Nero. I'm running older versions of both, which support Vista 32bit. In order to get 64bit support, I need to upgrade, which I don't really want to do right now.

I also want to move my office out of the basement to the empty bedroom upstairs, but don't really want to run cat5 and coax all over the house to do it. If the Cabling Fairy wants to do it for me, that'd be awesome.
jsbowden: (Default)
( Jun. 12th, 2008 08:55 am)
After I upgraded my machine at home at the end of last summer, I went ahead and gave MS a bit of my money and bought a copy of Vista Ultimate. Yeah, I know, but it's my money. I got the retail version because it comes with both 32 and 64 bit media, and I wanted to play around with it.

After having Vista on my laptop for six months, I knew the ins and outs, what services to kill, and what interface tweaks to make for my own personal comfort. The one thing the laptop doesn't have is 64bit. OEM versions only come with one or the other, and Dell ships 32bit by default (and makes it difficult to get 64bit at that).

Having run the 64bit version on my desktop? I'm ready to dump the 32bit completely. The only hardware problem is that I have one piece of hardware for which there is no 64bit driver (which is really weird, since the 32bit driver for it is supplied by MS). It's an older video capture board that I don't really use anymore since my camcorder does FireWire, so it's not a loss I'm terribly concerned with. The 64bit version is faster, stable, uses all 4GB of the installed memory, and runs most of my software. The bits stopping me from dumping the 32bit partition are Studio and Nero. I'm running older versions of both, which support Vista 32bit. In order to get 64bit support, I need to upgrade, which I don't really want to do right now.

I also want to move my office out of the basement to the empty bedroom upstairs, but don't really want to run cat5 and coax all over the house to do it. If the Cabling Fairy wants to do it for me, that'd be awesome.
jsbowden: (ROFLOLZOMFGWFTBBQ!?!?!)
( Mar. 7th, 2008 10:14 am)
So, it's been a year since I got this here laptop with the Ultimate Vista on it. A year already. Wow.

So, my impression of Vista as it stands right now? I'm shocked at how stable it's been. Not a single crash. I've had some weird software issues with older stuff, but that's normally resolvable by running it in compatibility mode in the Windows version for which it was released (and most things don't need this). For a few, even that doesn't work. For that, I have Virtual PC installed with a Windows XP Pro VM set up. The drivers for this Nvidia card were incomplete initially (all DirectX and OpenGL capabilities were there, but the control panel bits allowing you to tweak them weren't), but that was taken care of after a few months. Everything else has just worked. The USB stack occasionally flakes out if I move the KVM focus to another host while I have a USB flash drive in and Ready Boost turned on (which is odd, since the flash drive is plugged into a USB port directly on the dock, and not the hub on the KVM (IOGear GCS1764)), but I can log in remotely or open the lid and use the built in keyboard to shut the machine down when that happens. This only happens with Ready Boosted flash drives. I'm guessing Vista resets the entire USB subsystem when the KVM hub disappears. This is a fairly major flaw, but easily worked around (take the flash drive out or turn off Ready Boost first).

I haven't seen the massive file access and copy delays a lot of folks have reported, so I can't speak to that. It's pretty. Being able to set a movie as my desktop background only works in Vista Ultimate (Dream Scene), and is only a decade and then some late compared to *BSD/Linux, but I don't normally do that sort of thing anyway, so it's a minor thing.

The Vista Media Center (Home Premium and Ultimate) works, is easy to use, and it's really annoying that you don't get a DVD decoder unless you have one of these two versions. I don't really give a fuck about the media center in and of itself, but it'd be nice to be able to view video content on DVD that we've made in house without having to install a third party decoder on Vista Enterprise. We don't need the whole media center, and have no interest in it, but Windows Media Player ships with ALL versions, and it could include a decoder, damn it. A minor thing, but one that's come up.

Over all, it's not worth upgrading an existing machine running XP, but for a new machine, Vista should not be any problem.
jsbowden: (ROFLOLZOMFGWFTBBQ!?!?!)
( Mar. 7th, 2008 10:14 am)
So, it's been a year since I got this here laptop with the Ultimate Vista on it. A year already. Wow.

So, my impression of Vista as it stands right now? I'm shocked at how stable it's been. Not a single crash. I've had some weird software issues with older stuff, but that's normally resolvable by running it in compatibility mode in the Windows version for which it was released (and most things don't need this). For a few, even that doesn't work. For that, I have Virtual PC installed with a Windows XP Pro VM set up. The drivers for this Nvidia card were incomplete initially (all DirectX and OpenGL capabilities were there, but the control panel bits allowing you to tweak them weren't), but that was taken care of after a few months. Everything else has just worked. The USB stack occasionally flakes out if I move the KVM focus to another host while I have a USB flash drive in and Ready Boost turned on (which is odd, since the flash drive is plugged into a USB port directly on the dock, and not the hub on the KVM (IOGear GCS1764)), but I can log in remotely or open the lid and use the built in keyboard to shut the machine down when that happens. This only happens with Ready Boosted flash drives. I'm guessing Vista resets the entire USB subsystem when the KVM hub disappears. This is a fairly major flaw, but easily worked around (take the flash drive out or turn off Ready Boost first).

I haven't seen the massive file access and copy delays a lot of folks have reported, so I can't speak to that. It's pretty. Being able to set a movie as my desktop background only works in Vista Ultimate (Dream Scene), and is only a decade and then some late compared to *BSD/Linux, but I don't normally do that sort of thing anyway, so it's a minor thing.

The Vista Media Center (Home Premium and Ultimate) works, is easy to use, and it's really annoying that you don't get a DVD decoder unless you have one of these two versions. I don't really give a fuck about the media center in and of itself, but it'd be nice to be able to view video content on DVD that we've made in house without having to install a third party decoder on Vista Enterprise. We don't need the whole media center, and have no interest in it, but Windows Media Player ships with ALL versions, and it could include a decoder, damn it. A minor thing, but one that's come up.

Over all, it's not worth upgrading an existing machine running XP, but for a new machine, Vista should not be any problem.
jsbowden: (ROFLOLZOMFGWFTBBQ!?!?!)
( Mar. 7th, 2008 10:14 am)
So, it's been a year since I got this here laptop with the Ultimate Vista on it. A year already. Wow.

So, my impression of Vista as it stands right now? I'm shocked at how stable it's been. Not a single crash. I've had some weird software issues with older stuff, but that's normally resolvable by running it in compatibility mode in the Windows version for which it was released (and most things don't need this). For a few, even that doesn't work. For that, I have Virtual PC installed with a Windows XP Pro VM set up. The drivers for this Nvidia card were incomplete initially (all DirectX and OpenGL capabilities were there, but the control panel bits allowing you to tweak them weren't), but that was taken care of after a few months. Everything else has just worked. The USB stack occasionally flakes out if I move the KVM focus to another host while I have a USB flash drive in and Ready Boost turned on (which is odd, since the flash drive is plugged into a USB port directly on the dock, and not the hub on the KVM (IOGear GCS1764)), but I can log in remotely or open the lid and use the built in keyboard to shut the machine down when that happens. This only happens with Ready Boosted flash drives. I'm guessing Vista resets the entire USB subsystem when the KVM hub disappears. This is a fairly major flaw, but easily worked around (take the flash drive out or turn off Ready Boost first).

I haven't seen the massive file access and copy delays a lot of folks have reported, so I can't speak to that. It's pretty. Being able to set a movie as my desktop background only works in Vista Ultimate (Dream Scene), and is only a decade and then some late compared to *BSD/Linux, but I don't normally do that sort of thing anyway, so it's a minor thing.

The Vista Media Center (Home Premium and Ultimate) works, is easy to use, and it's really annoying that you don't get a DVD decoder unless you have one of these two versions. I don't really give a fuck about the media center in and of itself, but it'd be nice to be able to view video content on DVD that we've made in house without having to install a third party decoder on Vista Enterprise. We don't need the whole media center, and have no interest in it, but Windows Media Player ships with ALL versions, and it could include a decoder, damn it. A minor thing, but one that's come up.

Over all, it's not worth upgrading an existing machine running XP, but for a new machine, Vista should not be any problem.
Pinnacle Studio and Studio Plus version 10.6 ReadMe
Pinnacle – a division of Avid
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Congratulations! You are about to enter the world of professional quality movie making. If you encounter any problems when working with Studio or Studio Plus version 10, please read the manual and this text.

Technical Notes

1. Updates
When you run Studio or Studio Plus you may be prompted to install an update to the software. We strongly recommend you go through this update procedure as it will enhance your Studio experience.

...

16. Installing Studio on Windows Vista
To install Studio on Vista, please navigate to the “Studio Vista Installer” directory on your installation DVD. Click on the setup.exe to start the Studio installation.


Guess what fucking directory doesn't fucking exist anywhere on the very same fucking DVD that this fucking ReadMe.doc file is located in the root fucking (that may be redundant for those of you from Oz) directory of?

Go on, guess.
Pinnacle Studio and Studio Plus version 10.6 ReadMe
Pinnacle – a division of Avid
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Congratulations! You are about to enter the world of professional quality movie making. If you encounter any problems when working with Studio or Studio Plus version 10, please read the manual and this text.

Technical Notes

1. Updates
When you run Studio or Studio Plus you may be prompted to install an update to the software. We strongly recommend you go through this update procedure as it will enhance your Studio experience.

...

16. Installing Studio on Windows Vista
To install Studio on Vista, please navigate to the “Studio Vista Installer” directory on your installation DVD. Click on the setup.exe to start the Studio installation.


Guess what fucking directory doesn't fucking exist anywhere on the very same fucking DVD that this fucking ReadMe.doc file is located in the root fucking (that may be redundant for those of you from Oz) directory of?

Go on, guess.
Pinnacle Studio and Studio Plus version 10.6 ReadMe
Pinnacle – a division of Avid
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Congratulations! You are about to enter the world of professional quality movie making. If you encounter any problems when working with Studio or Studio Plus version 10, please read the manual and this text.

Technical Notes

1. Updates
When you run Studio or Studio Plus you may be prompted to install an update to the software. We strongly recommend you go through this update procedure as it will enhance your Studio experience.

...

16. Installing Studio on Windows Vista
To install Studio on Vista, please navigate to the “Studio Vista Installer” directory on your installation DVD. Click on the setup.exe to start the Studio installation.


Guess what fucking directory doesn't fucking exist anywhere on the very same fucking DVD that this fucking ReadMe.doc file is located in the root fucking (that may be redundant for those of you from Oz) directory of?

Go on, guess.
Windows Update just informed me that I had one Critical and one Optional updates available, and would I like to download and install them?

One update for Windows Defender, which seems to get updated about once every three days lately, and a new driver from Nvidia for the NVS 120M.

So I said "Sure, go get 'em!" Well, I moused around, selected all available updates, and let it do its thing.

It seems to have finished. The graphics driver is about the biggest reason for Windows instability. It hooks WAY deep in to the kernel, and buggy graphics drivers mean your box will crash regularly.

Vista has apparently backed off from the decision made from NT 3.51 to 4.0. I just updated a graphics driver on a running machine, and no reboot was required. I was shocked. I have verified via the Nvidia Control Panel and the Device Manager that yes, it is in fact using the latest driver, dated 4 Oct, 2007. I was using the driver released in July this morning when I got in.

This is kinda creepy. Windows isn't supposed to be this friendly.
Windows Update just informed me that I had one Critical and one Optional updates available, and would I like to download and install them?

One update for Windows Defender, which seems to get updated about once every three days lately, and a new driver from Nvidia for the NVS 120M.

So I said "Sure, go get 'em!" Well, I moused around, selected all available updates, and let it do its thing.

It seems to have finished. The graphics driver is about the biggest reason for Windows instability. It hooks WAY deep in to the kernel, and buggy graphics drivers mean your box will crash regularly.

Vista has apparently backed off from the decision made from NT 3.51 to 4.0. I just updated a graphics driver on a running machine, and no reboot was required. I was shocked. I have verified via the Nvidia Control Panel and the Device Manager that yes, it is in fact using the latest driver, dated 4 Oct, 2007. I was using the driver released in July this morning when I got in.

This is kinda creepy. Windows isn't supposed to be this friendly.
Windows Update just informed me that I had one Critical and one Optional updates available, and would I like to download and install them?

One update for Windows Defender, which seems to get updated about once every three days lately, and a new driver from Nvidia for the NVS 120M.

So I said "Sure, go get 'em!" Well, I moused around, selected all available updates, and let it do its thing.

It seems to have finished. The graphics driver is about the biggest reason for Windows instability. It hooks WAY deep in to the kernel, and buggy graphics drivers mean your box will crash regularly.

Vista has apparently backed off from the decision made from NT 3.51 to 4.0. I just updated a graphics driver on a running machine, and no reboot was required. I was shocked. I have verified via the Nvidia Control Panel and the Device Manager that yes, it is in fact using the latest driver, dated 4 Oct, 2007. I was using the driver released in July this morning when I got in.

This is kinda creepy. Windows isn't supposed to be this friendly.
Should it bother me when the Office Pro 2007 installer spits out the common error box asking if I'd like to close the program, or check online for a solution and close the program?

Oh, and thanks, Nvidia, for finally, seven fucking months later, releasing an updated Vista driver for this graphics chip (Quadro NVS 120M if you care); 3d performance has been upgraded from "Sucks Shit Through a Swizzle Straw" to "Fucking Blows", so thanks for that.
Should it bother me when the Office Pro 2007 installer spits out the common error box asking if I'd like to close the program, or check online for a solution and close the program?

Oh, and thanks, Nvidia, for finally, seven fucking months later, releasing an updated Vista driver for this graphics chip (Quadro NVS 120M if you care); 3d performance has been upgraded from "Sucks Shit Through a Swizzle Straw" to "Fucking Blows", so thanks for that.
Should it bother me when the Office Pro 2007 installer spits out the common error box asking if I'd like to close the program, or check online for a solution and close the program?

Oh, and thanks, Nvidia, for finally, seven fucking months later, releasing an updated Vista driver for this graphics chip (Quadro NVS 120M if you care); 3d performance has been upgraded from "Sucks Shit Through a Swizzle Straw" to "Fucking Blows", so thanks for that.
I found something in Vista that's a definite improvement. The TCP stack in Vista DESTROYS XP's TCP stack.

Retrieving a 25MB file from our San Diego file server:

Vista - 5 minutes with the defaults.

XP - 8 minutes with tuned TCP window sizing, SACK turned on, and RFC 1323 extensions enabled (which beats the 11 minutes it took with the defaults).

Both are running MTU set to 0x500 (1280), to prevent fragmentation across the VPN tunnel (which they have to, as I've gone over Windows insane setting of DF on every packet in a previous post).
I found something in Vista that's a definite improvement. The TCP stack in Vista DESTROYS XP's TCP stack.

Retrieving a 25MB file from our San Diego file server:

Vista - 5 minutes with the defaults.

XP - 8 minutes with tuned TCP window sizing, SACK turned on, and RFC 1323 extensions enabled (which beats the 11 minutes it took with the defaults).

Both are running MTU set to 0x500 (1280), to prevent fragmentation across the VPN tunnel (which they have to, as I've gone over Windows insane setting of DF on every packet in a previous post).
I found something in Vista that's a definite improvement. The TCP stack in Vista DESTROYS XP's TCP stack.

Retrieving a 25MB file from our San Diego file server:

Vista - 5 minutes with the defaults.

XP - 8 minutes with tuned TCP window sizing, SACK turned on, and RFC 1323 extensions enabled (which beats the 11 minutes it took with the defaults).

Both are running MTU set to 0x500 (1280), to prevent fragmentation across the VPN tunnel (which they have to, as I've gone over Windows insane setting of DF on every packet in a previous post).
Instead of answer each of you individually, I'll give you my impressions of Vista.

So far, it's pretty. I actually like the look of the Vista interface. Of course, I'm on a machine more than capable of running it with all the eye candy enabled without worrying about performance, so it may suck rocks on lesser machines. I keep hearing about this Flip-3d thing, but I have yet to find it, so I'm not going to comment on that, since I haven't encountered it yet.

I don't like that the "Power Button" on the Start Menu defaults to Sleep (when I hit the power button, I mean it goddammit). Changing that behavior is buried. Deeply. Finding where and how to change it was a fun little game of Keyword Bingo in the Help search, and even then, it involved finding which particular page it was mentioned, in passing, in the middle of.

I doesn't like my dock. I don't know why. It boots up in less than thirty seconds outside of the dock. In the dock? It's almost 5 minutes from hitting the power button until it'll display a login prompt. Looking at the Device Manager, there are no hardware conflicts, unrecognized hardware, or driver problems. It just hates being docked.

My outburst yesterday was in direct response to a problem I was having with Windows Update. It was refusing to run. Well, it would run, but it would then stop with an error code that doesn't exist according to either Help or the the MS Knowledge Base. I eventually found it in the TechNet Forums. Apparently, Windows Software Update Service on Windows Server 2003 patched to current is broken for Vista, and if you have a policy assigning machines in an OU to a WSUS server, unlike XP, which will fall back to hitting Microsoft if it can't update locally, Vista simply refuses to update and issues an undocumented error code. I tried plugging the box in to the visitor network and running it. That was an exercise in frustration, since it then refuses to run telling you that you need to be on the network with the WSUS server and issues an undocumented error code (but at least this one comes with a useful message and not just a random hex code all by its lonesome). I'm still pissed off over this. I have users who disappear for six weeks at a time. They won't have access to the WSUS server. I want them to be able to get patches directly from MS when they're not in the office. Not with Vista! They can either get WSUS updates, OR MS Update hosted updates, but not both, depending where they are.

Vista can create processes it can't kill. I let my machine attempt to turn itself off for 20 hours. In the end, I had to hard power it down. It took a while to isolate what service was refusing to die, and why. XP can kill anything from the Task Manager. It's not recommended to kill a specific process (ending the application is the recommended), but I've never met one that couldn't be killed if necessity demanded it.

While I like the look of Vista, the new Start Menu behavior is annoying. I'll get used to it, but if you want to see your games, don't tell Vista to use the classic menu. I had installed NWN2 just to see how it would run in a shiny new machine. It still bogs down at any resolution over 800x600 with all the visuals maxed, and even at 800x600, I wasn't able to totally turn everything all the way up, but that's an NWN2 thing, not Vista. No, the annoyance with Vista is how the "Games" menu works. I had a single icon for NNW2 under the Games menu. Not a NWN2 nested menu, just the icon to run the game. Reverting to classic, even that disappears. Where's my NWN2 folder dammit? What if I want to run the Toolset? What if I want to pull up the ReadMe? No, all I get to do is play the game, and only if I use the new menu layout. Except, I went to look at the properties for the icon so I could copy it create my own in the classic menu, and hey, all that other shit is there as alternate context! That's actually kinda cool, and anything bearing the Games For Windows logo has to set this up properly by default apparently, but Vista was faking it for NWN2, since MS has included the knowledge of how to do this for several thousand legacy games with Vista ( I had to dig around to find all this out on my own. Which games? Only they know). However, some notice of this fundamental change would have been, you know, NICE. Here I am, looking for an NWN2 folder under Start -> Programs, and nope, it's nowhere to be found. I only checked Games because I had a sneaking suspicion of what the fuck had happened, but I expected to find a nested menu, as I said above, not a single icon, and not even having that under the classic menu, that just really annoyed me. Fuck you Microsoft. I shouldn't be FORCED to use your new layout, just to see MY fucking software. I've since formatted and reinstalled, so no more NWN2 on this box, but it was just to satisfy my curiosity that it even got installed in the first place, so no big loss there.

The Control Panel layout and behavior has changed, yet again. Some things have been added that should have always been there (Device Manager, on the Control Panel? What a great idea! Wait, didn't it DEBUT there on Windows95!?). Other things have been renamed and/or grouped. For no reason that I can grok, but I'm sure it makes some kind of fucked up sense to some code monkey who hasn't been out of his cube in ten years back at Microsoft.

I don't have to install TweakUI to disable Autorun anymore. There's an Autorun entry in the Control Panel menu. One check box, and Autorun is off. You can choose to leave it on and there's a whole slew of things you can assign options for if you choose to do so. As far as I'm concerned, Autorun is a gaping hole you can drive a Mac truck sized bit of malware through (see Sony), and I suspect one little GPO and I can disable it domain wide. Now I just want all the other parts of TweakUI available. Or for Vista to let me install the XP flavor. I want my focus follows mouse back. Now.

User Access Control is a nightmare. I'm sure you've seen the Mac commercial? It really IS that bad. Unlike OS X, which asks for an administrator password if you make CHANGES to system files or settings, UAC won't even let you look at them without confirmation. And it's not like it's adding security since it doesn't require a password, just click yes or no. Of course, some software installers puke and die if you don't have it turned on, because Oh My God, you can't REALLY not want it ON!!!!!!!!!!!11!!11!!!ELEVENTY!!

There's more, but that's all I'm up for getting in to right now.
Instead of answer each of you individually, I'll give you my impressions of Vista.

So far, it's pretty. I actually like the look of the Vista interface. Of course, I'm on a machine more than capable of running it with all the eye candy enabled without worrying about performance, so it may suck rocks on lesser machines. I keep hearing about this Flip-3d thing, but I have yet to find it, so I'm not going to comment on that, since I haven't encountered it yet.

I don't like that the "Power Button" on the Start Menu defaults to Sleep (when I hit the power button, I mean it goddammit). Changing that behavior is buried. Deeply. Finding where and how to change it was a fun little game of Keyword Bingo in the Help search, and even then, it involved finding which particular page it was mentioned, in passing, in the middle of.

I doesn't like my dock. I don't know why. It boots up in less than thirty seconds outside of the dock. In the dock? It's almost 5 minutes from hitting the power button until it'll display a login prompt. Looking at the Device Manager, there are no hardware conflicts, unrecognized hardware, or driver problems. It just hates being docked.

My outburst yesterday was in direct response to a problem I was having with Windows Update. It was refusing to run. Well, it would run, but it would then stop with an error code that doesn't exist according to either Help or the the MS Knowledge Base. I eventually found it in the TechNet Forums. Apparently, Windows Software Update Service on Windows Server 2003 patched to current is broken for Vista, and if you have a policy assigning machines in an OU to a WSUS server, unlike XP, which will fall back to hitting Microsoft if it can't update locally, Vista simply refuses to update and issues an undocumented error code. I tried plugging the box in to the visitor network and running it. That was an exercise in frustration, since it then refuses to run telling you that you need to be on the network with the WSUS server and issues an undocumented error code (but at least this one comes with a useful message and not just a random hex code all by its lonesome). I'm still pissed off over this. I have users who disappear for six weeks at a time. They won't have access to the WSUS server. I want them to be able to get patches directly from MS when they're not in the office. Not with Vista! They can either get WSUS updates, OR MS Update hosted updates, but not both, depending where they are.

Vista can create processes it can't kill. I let my machine attempt to turn itself off for 20 hours. In the end, I had to hard power it down. It took a while to isolate what service was refusing to die, and why. XP can kill anything from the Task Manager. It's not recommended to kill a specific process (ending the application is the recommended), but I've never met one that couldn't be killed if necessity demanded it.

While I like the look of Vista, the new Start Menu behavior is annoying. I'll get used to it, but if you want to see your games, don't tell Vista to use the classic menu. I had installed NWN2 just to see how it would run in a shiny new machine. It still bogs down at any resolution over 800x600 with all the visuals maxed, and even at 800x600, I wasn't able to totally turn everything all the way up, but that's an NWN2 thing, not Vista. No, the annoyance with Vista is how the "Games" menu works. I had a single icon for NNW2 under the Games menu. Not a NWN2 nested menu, just the icon to run the game. Reverting to classic, even that disappears. Where's my NWN2 folder dammit? What if I want to run the Toolset? What if I want to pull up the ReadMe? No, all I get to do is play the game, and only if I use the new menu layout. Except, I went to look at the properties for the icon so I could copy it create my own in the classic menu, and hey, all that other shit is there as alternate context! That's actually kinda cool, and anything bearing the Games For Windows logo has to set this up properly by default apparently, but Vista was faking it for NWN2, since MS has included the knowledge of how to do this for several thousand legacy games with Vista ( I had to dig around to find all this out on my own. Which games? Only they know). However, some notice of this fundamental change would have been, you know, NICE. Here I am, looking for an NWN2 folder under Start -> Programs, and nope, it's nowhere to be found. I only checked Games because I had a sneaking suspicion of what the fuck had happened, but I expected to find a nested menu, as I said above, not a single icon, and not even having that under the classic menu, that just really annoyed me. Fuck you Microsoft. I shouldn't be FORCED to use your new layout, just to see MY fucking software. I've since formatted and reinstalled, so no more NWN2 on this box, but it was just to satisfy my curiosity that it even got installed in the first place, so no big loss there.

The Control Panel layout and behavior has changed, yet again. Some things have been added that should have always been there (Device Manager, on the Control Panel? What a great idea! Wait, didn't it DEBUT there on Windows95!?). Other things have been renamed and/or grouped. For no reason that I can grok, but I'm sure it makes some kind of fucked up sense to some code monkey who hasn't been out of his cube in ten years back at Microsoft.

I don't have to install TweakUI to disable Autorun anymore. There's an Autorun entry in the Control Panel menu. One check box, and Autorun is off. You can choose to leave it on and there's a whole slew of things you can assign options for if you choose to do so. As far as I'm concerned, Autorun is a gaping hole you can drive a Mac truck sized bit of malware through (see Sony), and I suspect one little GPO and I can disable it domain wide. Now I just want all the other parts of TweakUI available. Or for Vista to let me install the XP flavor. I want my focus follows mouse back. Now.

User Access Control is a nightmare. I'm sure you've seen the Mac commercial? It really IS that bad. Unlike OS X, which asks for an administrator password if you make CHANGES to system files or settings, UAC won't even let you look at them without confirmation. And it's not like it's adding security since it doesn't require a password, just click yes or no. Of course, some software installers puke and die if you don't have it turned on, because Oh My God, you can't REALLY not want it ON!!!!!!!!!!!11!!11!!!ELEVENTY!!

There's more, but that's all I'm up for getting in to right now.
.

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags