Things aren't looking so good:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/12/japan.nuclear/
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2011/03/20113124353222667.html
Unlike the Ukraine, there isn't a whole lot of Japan to move to in the event large sections of it become uninhabitable.
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/03/12/japan.nuclear/
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2011/03/20113124353222667.html
Unlike the Ukraine, there isn't a whole lot of Japan to move to in the event large sections of it become uninhabitable.
From:
no subject
All those things are likely to reduce the damage by orders of magnitude, as I understand.
From:
no subject
(Not that the situation is good. Radiation exposure per hour, on-site, is normal human exposure per year.)
d) Still, while the Japanese (and the rest of the western world) builds much safer reactors than Russia ever did, there are still even safer ways to build them. Can't seem to get any approved here in the United States, and this will probably make it impossible to get anything done for another thirty or forty years.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
1) At least one agency is not really sure what's going on, or
2) At least one agency is bullshitting.
Nothing I've read today is encouraging at all.